Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporations, regardless of size or corporate form. Yet to date, little consideration has been given to the question whether the reasons supporting recognition of corporate liability for crime apply with equal force to close corporations. Nor has the question whether the same sentencing rules should apply to close corporations and their publicly held counterparts been addressed. Hence, this Article journeys off the beaten path to explore these intersecting themes
This article examines the common law respondeat superior test for corporate criminal liability and p...
Corporate crime has once again become an important issue on the U.S. legislative agenda, leading Con...
Corporate crime continues to occur at an alarming rate, yet disagreement persists among scholars and...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
The pervasive influence enjoyed by large, publicly held corporations has inspired a body of scholars...
In the United States, corporate criminal liability developed in response to the industrial revolutio...
The debate over corporate criminal liability has long involved a fight between proponents who argue ...
This article compares the criminal punishment of corporations in the twenty-first century with two a...
This Article traces the Sentencing Commission\u27s path in completing that task32 and considers what...
This Article considers modern systems of criminal justice and the different models of assessing resp...
Under current federal law, a corporation, no matter how large or small, is criminally liable if a me...
Briefly, three positions concerning corporate liability may be identified. First, there are systems ...
For many years, law and economics scholars, as well as politicians and regulators, have debated whet...
Part I of this article reviews general principles of corporate liability. Part II examines pre-convi...
This Article offers an alternative analysis of the doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in Dott...
This article examines the common law respondeat superior test for corporate criminal liability and p...
Corporate crime has once again become an important issue on the U.S. legislative agenda, leading Con...
Corporate crime continues to occur at an alarming rate, yet disagreement persists among scholars and...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
The pervasive influence enjoyed by large, publicly held corporations has inspired a body of scholars...
In the United States, corporate criminal liability developed in response to the industrial revolutio...
The debate over corporate criminal liability has long involved a fight between proponents who argue ...
This article compares the criminal punishment of corporations in the twenty-first century with two a...
This Article traces the Sentencing Commission\u27s path in completing that task32 and considers what...
This Article considers modern systems of criminal justice and the different models of assessing resp...
Under current federal law, a corporation, no matter how large or small, is criminally liable if a me...
Briefly, three positions concerning corporate liability may be identified. First, there are systems ...
For many years, law and economics scholars, as well as politicians and regulators, have debated whet...
Part I of this article reviews general principles of corporate liability. Part II examines pre-convi...
This Article offers an alternative analysis of the doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in Dott...
This article examines the common law respondeat superior test for corporate criminal liability and p...
Corporate crime has once again become an important issue on the U.S. legislative agenda, leading Con...
Corporate crime continues to occur at an alarming rate, yet disagreement persists among scholars and...